it is not foolish to believe in ghost?

it is not foolish to believe in ghost?
It's a debate
Please give me some materials about this topic
3Q very much!

相信你要进行的是英文辩论,所以在进行中文说明的同时,还附上对应的英文表达.
1、混淆概念法：将信鬼与宗教信仰挂钩
相信有鬼并不愚蠢,如果是对一个有宗教信仰的人来说.
所有的宗教都有关于鬼的说法.如果一个人说另一人愚蠢,因为另一人信鬼（教）.那么这个人所侮辱的就不仅是另一人,而是所有信鬼（教）的人.这种行为才是真正的愚蠢.
It is not foolish to believe in ghost if one is religious.All religion have story about ghosts.
If someone call one foolish for his believe,then it is not the one that he is insulting but all religious people.Such behavior is actually called -- foolishness.
2、概念转移：
“信鬼--鬼是否存在--人类对自然的认识局限”
使用前提：对方用“世界上没有鬼”之类的论调
对方刚才说,世界上没有鬼,所以信鬼是愚蠢的.
遗憾的是,我方没有足够的证据证明世界上有鬼.
然而,同样遗憾的是,对方也没有拿出足够的证据证明世界上没有鬼.
然而,在核能技术未发现以前,一种武器可以毁灭一座城市的事情也仅限于虚无缥缈的传说.
我方认为,人类对自然的认识是有局限的,也是在不断发展的.
因此,我方认为,在人类对自然的认知未能充分证明世界上没有鬼之前,不能断然否认鬼的存在,更不能因此而说信鬼是愚蠢的.
Our opponents say,since there is no such thing like ghost in the world,believe in ghost is foolish.
Regretfully,we have not sufficient evidence to prove the exisstance of ghost.
But also regretfully,we found no sufficient evidence from our opponents to prove the nonexisstance of ghost.
However,before the development of nuclear technology,the story of a weapon that could entirely destory a whole city just existed in legions.
We believe that human knowlege on the nature is still limited,and is still in discovering and developing.
Thefore,our opinion is:Until the human knowlege on the nature is so developed that could prove nonexistance of ghost,none should deny the existance of ghost,and call the believe of ghost is foolish.
以上,应该够你在课堂上用的了.
希望你们胜出、成功.