【贫富差距英文】跪求英语作文一篇,贫富差距,Theworld'swealth...
答案:2 悬赏:60 手机版
解决时间 2021-02-21 15:30
- 提问者网友:人傍凄凉立暮秋
- 2021-02-20 22:14
【贫富差距英文】跪求英语作文一篇,贫富差距,Theworld'swealth...
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友:山河有幸埋战骨
- 2021-02-20 23:03
【答案】 It’s certainly true that without a profit motive,the rational thing to do would be to sit at home all day and play video games — or whatever other pursuit you might choose if you never had to worry about paying the bills.And history shows that government efforts to try to equalize wealth or manage economies usually backfire.
Inequality of wealth,by itself,isn’t new.In the past few decades,there’s evidence that the gap in some countries is widening – including the U.S.But super-rich folks like Forbes 400 billionaires and greedy corporate executives are hardly a recent phenomenon.
A hundred years ago,the wealth gap between the richest robber baron and the poorest farmer was wider than the current spread between a $100-million-a-year CEO and the worst-paid worker.And if you factor in modern health care,“conveniences” like cars,TVs and cellphones,the average American today probably enjoys a standard of living on a par with some of the richest Americans a century ago.So a widening income gap and wealth inequity doesn’t seem to have hurt progress.
The issue isn’t whether money is a potent incentive for keeping us all busy trying to buy or build a bigger house or inventing the next cool electronic device.The question is whether the playing field is level.Equality of opportunity isn’t just a matter of fairness.No society can expect to thrive if it doesn’t fully tap the talent and ability of its entire workforce — including those who happen to be born poor.
Economists talk about “human capital” like any other input to their economic models.In theory,free markets will allocate that human capital to the best use by rewarding best work that the market values the most highly.
Inequality of wealth,by itself,isn’t new.In the past few decades,there’s evidence that the gap in some countries is widening – including the U.S.But super-rich folks like Forbes 400 billionaires and greedy corporate executives are hardly a recent phenomenon.
A hundred years ago,the wealth gap between the richest robber baron and the poorest farmer was wider than the current spread between a $100-million-a-year CEO and the worst-paid worker.And if you factor in modern health care,“conveniences” like cars,TVs and cellphones,the average American today probably enjoys a standard of living on a par with some of the richest Americans a century ago.So a widening income gap and wealth inequity doesn’t seem to have hurt progress.
The issue isn’t whether money is a potent incentive for keeping us all busy trying to buy or build a bigger house or inventing the next cool electronic device.The question is whether the playing field is level.Equality of opportunity isn’t just a matter of fairness.No society can expect to thrive if it doesn’t fully tap the talent and ability of its entire workforce — including those who happen to be born poor.
Economists talk about “human capital” like any other input to their economic models.In theory,free markets will allocate that human capital to the best use by rewarding best work that the market values the most highly.
全部回答
- 1楼网友:野味小生
- 2021-02-21 00:35
我检查一下我的答案
我要举报
如以上问答信息为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息,可以点下面链接进行举报!
大家都在看
推荐资讯