Nobody likes home economics (家政学). But restoring the program could help us in the fight against obesity and chronic (慢性的) diseases today.
The home economics movement was founded on the belief that housework and food preparation were important subjects that should be studied scientifically. The first classes occurred in the agricultural and technical colleges that were built in the 1860s. When most departments of universities rejected women, home economics was a back door into higher education.
Indeed, in the early 20th century, home economics was a serious subject When few people understood germ (微生物) theory and almost no one had heard of vitamins, home economics classes offered vital information about washing hands regularly, eating fruits and vegetables and not feeding coffee to babies.
However, today we remember only the fixed ideas about home economics, forgetting the movement’s most important lessons on healthy eating and cooking. Too many Americans simply don’t know how to cook. Our diets, consisting of highly processed foods made cheaply outside the home, have contributed to many serious health problems. In the last decade, many cities and states have tried to tax junk food heavily or to ban the use of food stamps (食品券) to buy soda. Clearly, many people are doubtful about any governmental steps to promote healthy eating. But what if the government put the tools of obesity prevention in the hands of children themselves by teaching them how to cook?
My first experience with home economics happened two decades ago when I was a seventh grader in a North Carolina public school. A year later, my father’s job took our family to Wales, where I attended a large school for a few months. It was the first time I had ever really cooked anything. I remember that it was fun, and with an instructor standing by, it wasn’t hard. Those lessons stuck with me when I first started cooking for my husband and myself after college and they still do. Teaching cooking in public schools can help solve some problems facing Americans t day. The history of home economics shows it’s possible.
【小题1】Home economics .A.is a subject becoming more and more popular with AmericansB.is often used to help fight against obesity and chronic diseasesC.once offered women a. special approach to university educationD.was first taught in the agricultural and technical colleges in the early 1900s【小题2】 The third paragraph mainly tells us .A.the importance of regular hand washingB.the health benefits of fruits and vegetablesC.the contents of home economics classes in the early 20th centuryD.the significance of teaching home economics in the early 20th century【小题3】 In the opinion of the author, how should we fight against childhood obesity?A.Children should be taught how to cook.B.A heavy tax should be put on junk foodC.Healthy eating should be promoted at schoolD.Using food stamps to buy soda should be banned【小题4】 What does the author imply in the last paragraph?
A. Her family moved frequently in her childhood.
R Cooking classes have a far-reaching influence on her later life.
C. To receive a better education, she went to a large school in Wales.
D. Teaching cooking is the key to solving Americans’ health problems.C
Nobody likes home economics (家政学). But restoring the program could help us in the fight ag
答案:2 悬赏:0 手机版
解决时间 2021-01-03 21:39
- 提问者网友:欺烟
- 2021-01-02 21:52
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友:不甚了了
- 2021-01-02 22:36
(答案→)C 解析:本文讲述的是关于家政学,家政学的历史和发展。我们今天要正确的对待家政学在healthy eating and cooking方面的重要意义。【小题1】细节理解题。由文章中第二段最后一句When most departments of universities rejected women, home economics was a back door into higher education.可知家政学给了妇女一个进入大学接受高等教育的机会。【小题2】段意理解题。纵观第三段的内容可知,在20世纪初期,教授家政学知识在人们生活中的重要意义。【小题3】细节理解题。由文章中第四段But what if the government put the tools of obesity prevention in the hands of children themselves by teaching them how to cook?可知答案选A。【小题4】细节理解题。文章的最后一段主要讲了作者的亲身经历。从作者小时候学会做饭一直到成家后给丈夫、孩子做饭,这些经历对作者的生活产生了深远的影响。A、C、D三个选项的表述与原文意思不符。
全部回答
- 1楼网友:患得患失的劫
- 2021-01-02 23:56
对的,就是这个意思
我要举报
如以上问答信息为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息,可以点下面链接进行举报!
大家都在看
推荐资讯