Ask someone what they have done to help the environment recently and they will almost certainly mention recycling. Recycling in the home is very important of course. However, being forced to recycle often means we already have more material than we need. We are dealing with the results of that over-consumption in the greenest way possible, but it would be far better if we did not need to bring so much material home in the first place. The total amount of packaging increased by 12% between 1999 and 2005. It now makes up a third of a typical household’s waste in the UK. In many supermarkets nowadays food items are packaged twice with plastic and cardboard. Too much packaging is doing serious damage to the environment. The UK, for example, is running out of it for carrying this unnecessary waste. If such packaging is burnt, it gives off greenhouse gases which go on to cause the greenhouse effect. Recycling helps, but the process itself uses energy. The solution is not to produce such items in the first place. Food waste is a serious problem, too. Too many supermarkets encourage customers to buy more than they need. However, a few of them are coming round to the idea that this cannot continue, encouraging customers to reuse their plastic bags, for example. But this is not just about supermarkets. It is about all of us. We have learned to associate packaging with quality. We have learned to think that something unpackaged is of poor quality. This is especially true of food. But is also applies to a wide range of consumer products, which often have far more packaging than necessary.
There are signs of hope. As more of us recycle, we are beginning to realize just how much unnecessary material are collecting. We need to face the wastefulness of our consumer culture, but we have a mountain to climb.
【小题1】What does the underlined phrase “over-consumption” refer to? A.Using too much packaging. B.Recycling too many wastes. C.Making more products than necessary. D.Having more material than is needed.【小题2】The author uses figures in Paragraph 2 to show .A.the tendency of cutting household wasteB.the increase of packaging recycling C.the rapid growth of super marketsD.the fact of packaging overuse【小题3】According to the text, recycling . A.helps control the greenhouse effect B.means burning packaging for energyC.is the solution to gas shortage D.leads to a waste of land【小题4】What can be inferred from Paragraph 4? A.Unpackaged products are of bad quality.B.Supermarkets care more about packaging.C.It is improper to judge quality by packaging. D.Other products are better packaged than food.【小题5】What can we learn from the last paragraph? A.Fighting wastefulness is difficult.B.Needless material is mostly recycled.C.People like collecting recyclable waste. D.The author is proud of their consumer culture.D
Ask someone what they have done to help the environment recently and they will almost cert
答案:2 悬赏:80 手机版
解决时间 2021-12-19 08:32
- 提问者网友:鼻尖触碰
- 2021-12-19 01:19
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友:玩世
- 2021-12-19 02:42
(答案→)D 解析:文章讲述了人们应该对于环境保护有个清醒的认识,能循环利用就利用,有的人认为包装不好,可能产品的质量不好,要知道包装纸也是一种污染,如果把它们烧掉,会产生温室气体,会造成温室效应。所以我们应对过度包装的危害应有清醒的认识,文章最后指出要想保护好环境还有很长的路要走。【小题1】词义猜测题。根据文中的We are dealing with the results of that over-consumption in the greenest way possible, but it would be far better if we did not need to bring so much material home in the first place. 可知划线部分意义应为“过度消费”,故选D。【小题2】作者用意猜测题。根据作者在文中使用的数字可知,作者使用数字的目的是为了让读者清楚地理解过度包装的现实问题,故选D。【小题3】细节理解题。根据If such packaging is burnt, it gives off greenhouse gases which go on to cause the greenhouse effect. Recycling helps, but the process itself uses energy.可知A项正确。【小题4】推理判断题。第四段讲述了人们对于包装不好的物品的固有认识,即:人们普遍认为包装不好的物品质量肯定差,所以C项应为正确答案。【小题5】推理判断题。文章讲述了人们对于过度包装的危害的认识及人们应有的积极态度,所以最后一段又给我们带来了希望,但是最后一句we have a mountain to climb.提示我们事情不会一蹴而就,故选A。
全部回答
- 1楼网友:洎扰庸人
- 2021-12-19 04:15
感谢回答,我学习了
我要举报
如以上问答信息为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息,可以点下面链接进行举报!
大家都在看
推荐资讯