南海危险区：为什么将中国逼入墙角是危险的

南海危险区：为什么将中国逼入墙角是危险的

The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s (PCA) ruling in the South China Sea case filed by the Philippines has been labeled a “sweeping victory” against China. It concluded that China has no legal basis to claim historic rights within the nine-dash line in the South China Sea and that none of the land features in the Spratlys meet the criteria for an island that China — or any other country — can use to claim a 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
海牙国际仲裁法庭对由菲律宾起诉的南中国海案例的宣判被认为是菲方“大获全胜“。裁决中国对于九段线内南中国海领域的历史拥有权没有法律依据， 南沙群岛的地貌并不符合岛屿的特征，中国或任何其他国家都不能以此占有200海里以内的专属经济区。
Although the legal ambiguity may make it hard to resolve the disputes it provides a certain flexibility for all claimants to manage their behavior and leaves room for compromises if necessary.
尽管该法律模糊性使其难以解决争端，却也为权益所取者的行为带来了一定的灵活性，在必要时为各方相互妥协让步留下了空间。