有一句话不会翻译，应该说翻译的很乱，看不懂结构，求讲解

o paraphrase 18th-century statesman EdmundBurke，所需要的就是好人袖手旁观： 18世纪的政治家EdmundBurke解释道“ 被需要的或者被误导的胜利都是因为好人不会做任何事 ” 标准翻译, “all that is needed or the triumph of a misguided causeis that good people do nothing：“被误导的事业想要取得胜利？先读哪后读哪。” 主要就是原句引号中的句子，应该怎么分析句式结构呢.” 我的翻译： 18世纪政治家埃德蒙〃柏克曾说过类似这样的话

你的单词 有误， 所以回答问题的人 都差点被你misguided 了 ~~~呵呵 ~~

原句正解 是 “All that is needed for the triumph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing.”翻译过来 就是 ：一个错误的事业之所以会成功，就是（因为）好人什么也不做/袖手旁观。

你再琢磨琢磨~~欢迎追问~~

谢谢采纳！~~~

1 the dictionary should be placed at the place that is accessible to read.

2 he was failure to find this job so that he understood the importance of first impression

3 majority of students supported the advice that he mentioned

4 i never occured that we will be influenced so much by the air quality in the office

5 after investigation, the police made a conclusion that the boss of flower shop should be in charge of the fire

6 they use the advantage of going aboard to learn the lives and food habits in western

7 it's that flood make people understand the importance of plants fully

我个人理解是这样的 直译是这样的： 这些是被需要的，或者被误导的事业的胜利，就是好人不做任何事 all that指的是“被误导的事业的胜利”和“好人不做任何事”，思维转一下，好人不做任何事，被误导的事业才胜利

(all that is needed) (for the triumph of a misguided cause) (is that good people do nothing) (需要的是）（误入歧途的事业要胜利的话）（就是好人不作为） 弄顺了就是： 误入歧途的事业要成功的话，所需的就是好人不作为。