那位同志帮忙翻译一下,谢谢!

那位同志帮忙翻译一下,谢谢!
Farm program payments are often cited as a contributing factor in the conversion of grassland for crop production (Morgan). Commodity programs, crop insurance, and disaster payments compensate farmers when prices and/or yields are low. Over time these payments increase the average return to, and reduce the risk of, crop production. While a significant share of commodity payments are decoupled from production—producers cannot increase payments by producing more—some Federal farm program benefits continue to depend on production. Converting grassland to cropland will not change direct or counter-cyclical payments, which depend on only past production measured in specific base periods. Marketing loan benefits, crop insurance indemnities, and some disaster payment, however, do depend on current production and, with some limits, can increase when “new land” is added to a farm through conversion of grassland to cropland. Of course, policies that increase commodity demand and commodityprices—such as renewable fuels mandates (e.g., ethanol or bio-diesel)—can also encourage producers to shift land into crop production.

农业项目付款通常被认为是在为作物生产（摩根）草原转换因素.商品方案,作物保险,灾害补偿金的农民在价格和/或产量低.随着时间的推移,这些款项发放的平均回报,以增加和减少,农作物生产风险.虽然有很大一部分是支付商品从生产,生产者解耦不能增加生产更多,一些联邦农业项目给付继续依靠生产.草地耕地转换不会改变直接或反周期支付,而过去只在特定基期计算的生产依赖.营销贷款的好处,作物保险赔款,支付和一些灾害,但是,也取决于当前的生产,并与一些限制,可以增加时,“新土地”,是通过添加一个农场草地转化为耕地.当然,政策,提高商品的需求和commodityprices,如可再生燃料的任务（如乙醇或生物柴油）,也可以鼓励生产者转移到作物的土地生产