It may not be news to parents of teenage girls, but researchers have confirmed that no one

It may not be news to parents of teenage girls, but researchers have confirmed that no one can stop their 16-year-old daughter from deciding how the family spends its money.
The willpower and determination of teenage girls give them a big say in how a family’s money is spent on everything from food and meals to mobile phones, and, of course, clothes. Teenage boys did not show up at all in the analysis, which was designed to find out the influence of young people on household spending.
The findings on the spending power of teenage girls were calculated from Office for National Statistics records of family spending during the 1980s and 1990s. Researchers examined how much money went on services and leisure goods in different kinds of homes. They checked spending on food, restaurant meals, alcohol, tobacco, services, heating, transport, clothes and sports in 2,745 British families.
They found that teenage girls in the UK typically played an active role in family decisions about the allocation（分配）of household resources. But older children— those over the age of 21 who are still living with their parents—appear to have no say in household decisions.
They also tried to calculate to what extent the bargaining power of a teenager affected family budgets. “Every parent knows that children, even at a very early age, have their own preferences with regard to consumption, researchers said. “But children are only interested in a limited range of goods—mainly sweets and toys—and parents are able to use punishment to reduce their children’s bargaining power or remove it.” When they become teenagers, however, girls are much more independent and they are capable of earning their own money, which improves their bargaining power in family decisions.
The researchers could not explain why girls have more influence over spending while the evidence for boys is much less conclusive. However, this study could be of great significance to market research and how marketers target children.
【小题1】 From the passage we can learn that .A．teenage girls have more influence over family budgets than teenage boysB．teenage boys don't want to decide on household spendingC．teenage boys have some influence over householdD．teenage girls have weaker willpower and determination than teenage boys【小题2】What does the underlined part “give them a big say” in the second paragraph mean?A．Make them dare to say something.B．Make them want to know.C．Make them say something meaningful. D．Make their influence stronger.【小题3】It appears that household decisions are NOT affected by .A．girls living with parentsB．girls over 21C．girls over 12D．girls living alone【小题4】How can parents reduce children’s bargaining power?A．By persuading themB．By offering them sweets or toys.C．By threatening to punish them.D．By allocating household resources.A

(答案→)A 解析：【小题1】A 细节题。根据文章最后一段girls have more influence over spending while the evidence for boys is much less conclusive.说明女孩对家庭花费的影响比男孩要大，故A正确。【小题2】D 推理题。根据本句The willpower and determination of teenage girls give them a big say in how a family’s money is spent on everything在通读全文可知在家庭花费方面女孩子比男孩更有发言权影响更大故D正确。【小题3】B 细节题。根据第四段3,4行But older children— those over the age of 21 who are still living with their parents—appear to have no say in household decisions.说明B正确。【小题4】C 细节题。根据倒数第二段3,4,5三行But children are only interested in a limited range of goods—mainly sweets and toys—and parents are able to use punishment to reduce their children’s bargaining power or remove it.”说明C正确。

我检查一下我的答案