谁能帮我翻译一下。哈哈

But opinions from different parties are totally opposite.

       Most experts advocate the ending of the division of science and arts. They indicate that the separation of subjects strongly affects the overall quality of our people. It will result in some art students' lacking the spirit of exploring science as well as some science students' not oaring about important issues, such as society and human beings. To them, without the separation, students ate more likely to develop all-around abilities.

       However, many students and parents oppose this opinion, saying that canceling the separation of subjects means putting more pressure and burdens on students, white focusing on fewer courses enables students to excel in specific areas. Furthermore, each student has his or her strengths and weaknesses, which needs to be respected.

      In my opinion, even though our society needs more experts rather than people who are "Jack of all trades but master of none", separating subjects too early is not good for students' future development. What's more, it is unrealistic to talk about this issue if the present system of examination isn't reformed. Therefore, the Ministry of Education had better take a cautious attitude toward this problem.

但来自不同党派的意见是完全相反。
    大多数专家主张对科学和艺术师的结局。他们表明，受试者分离强烈影响着我国人民的整体素质。这将导致一些艺术学生缺乏科学的探索精神，以及一些科学专业的学生'不是重要的问题oaring，如社会和人类。对他们来说没有分离，学生吃更有可能发展全方位的能力。
    然而，许多学生和家长反对这种意见，认为取消学科分离手段把更大的压力和对学生的负担，减少白色课程着重让学生在具体领域中脱颖而出。此外，每个学生都有他或她的长处和弱点，这需要得到尊重。
    在我看来，即使我们的社会需要，而不是人谁是“所有行业，而是没有”大师杰克更多的专家，学科过早分离不为学生的未来发展都有好处。更重要的是，这是不现实的谈论这如果目前的考试制度不改革的问题。因此，教育部已对这个问题采取更谨慎的态度。

但是来自其他团队（部门）的意见是完全反对的。

大部分专家建议结束对文理的分科。他们指出学科的分类对于我们每个人的整体素质产生巨大影响。它将导致一些文史类学生缺乏科学探险，开发精神，同时也导致一些理科类学生缺乏讨论重要论题（比如社会与人类）的能力。对于专家他们而言，取消分科将能使学生吸收的更多，得到全面的发展。

尽管如此，许多学生和家长还是反对这个意见。他们认为取消分科会导致更多学业压力跟负担压在学生身上。更明智的目光，应关注在更少的课程使学生更擅长于某些特殊的领域。同时，每个学生都有自己的优缺点，这些必须得到我们的尊重。