《在马克思墓前讲话》的英文翻译

英语翻译这篇课文

On March 14th at two o 'clock in the afternoon, three as the greatest thinker ceased to think. Let him stay in one room, but the two minutes, and when we came back, and found him in his armchair peacefully sleeping - but is always fell asleep.
The death of this man, for by the militant proletariat of Europe, the historical science, is immeasurable losses. After the death of the blank, formed in the future will make people feel.
As Darwin found organic law of development, Marx found the development of human history, which has luxuriant part for the ideology of the covered with a simple fact: people must eat, drink, and live, wear, then engaged in politics, science, arts, religion, etc. Therefore, the material life material directly, so a nation of production or a certain phase of economic development, constitute, People's national system, the method that religion, art, and from the conception is developed on the basis of. Therefore, must also explained by the foundation, rather than as past do the opposite.
Not only such, Marx found the contemporary capitalist mode of production and the bourgeois society, the motion law of the special. Because of the surplus value, and previously regardless of bourgeois economist or the socialist critics did everything just in the dark.
Life is such that the two are enough, even if can make such a discovery, also is the happiness. But in his study of marxism every field (even in mathematics) are unique, so that the field was a lot of, but he is not any one field of study. "superficial, The scientific masters, but it is so far not major in him. In marxist view, science is a kind of history development, revolutionary force. Any one of the scientific theory of each new discovery, even if it's actual application and even foreseen, make marxist feel heartfelt joy. But when there are immediately on industrial development of general history, the influence of revolution, he found the joy is completely different. For example, he ever pay close attention to all aspects of the development of electricity that, not long ago, he also noted marcel DE Depp's discovery.
First is a revolutionary because marxism. His life is the real mission, in this or that kind of way to overthrow capitalism and established by the state, to participate in the modern facilities of the proletariat is liberation, the first modern proletarian realize their status and needs, and realize their liberation, this is actually - he's mission. Struggle is his life. Few people like him and enthusiastic, perseverance and fruitful to fight. The earliest newspaper (for), Paris 1842 "QianJinBao (1844)," the German - Brussels (1847), "new Rhine" (1848-1849), the New York daily news (1852 BBS in 1861 -), and many rich militancy brochure in Paris, London, Brussels and the work, and finally the organization is a great international workers' association, as all the work finished, frankly, the founder of the association, if nothing else, also can take this one result proud.
Because of this, and so is the contemporary marxist by jealousy and most calumniated man. Governments - whether despotism or republican government - are expelled him, The bourgeois -- whether conservative or extreme pro-democracy - are rushing to slander him, damn him. For all this his care, keep them as silk gently efface, just as in a reply only when necessary. He died in Europe and America, and from Siberia to California mines, millions of revolutionary memorial, love and respect. But I dare bold, said he might have had many enemies, but not necessarily a personal enemy.
His name and career will endure for ever!
Engels wrote in 1883

Frederick Engels’ Speech at the Grave of Karl Marx Highgate Cemetery, London. March 17, 1883

On the 14th of March, at a quarter to three in the afternoon, the greatest living thinker ceased to think. He had been left alone for scarcely two minutes, and when we came back we found him in his armchair, peacefully gone to sleep - but for ever.

An immeasurable loss has been sustained both by the militant proletariat of Europe and America, and by historical science, in the death of this man. The gap that has been left by the departure of this mighty spirit will soon enough make itself felt.

Just as Darwin discovered the law of development or organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of development of human history: the simple fact, hitherto concealed by an overgrowth of ideology, that mankind must first of all eat, drink, have shelter and clothing, before it can pursue politics, science, art, religion, etc.; that therefore the production of the immediate material means, and consequently the degree of economic development attained by a given people or during a given epoch, form the foundation upon which the state institutions, the legal conceptions, art, and even the ideas on religion, of the people concerned have been evolved, and in the light of which they must, therefore, be explained, instead of vice versa, as had hitherto been the case.

But that is not all. Marx also discovered the special law of motion governing the present-day capitalist mode of production, and the bourgeois society that this mode of production has created. The discovery of surplus value suddenly threw light on the problem, in trying to solve which all previous investigations, of both bourgeois economists and socialist critics, had been groping in the dark.

Two such discoveries would be enough for one lifetime. Happy the man to whom it is granted to make even one such discovery. But in every single field which Marx investigated - and he investigated very many fields, none of them superficially - in every field, even in that of mathematics, he made independent discoveries.

Such was the man of science. But this was not even half the man. Science was for Marx a historically dynamic, revolutionary force. However great the joy with which he welcomed a new discovery in some theoretical science whose practical application perhaps it was as yet quite impossible to envisage, he experienced quite another kind of joy when the discovery involved immediate revolutionary changes in industry, and in historical development in general. For example, he followed closely the development of the discoveries made in the field of electricity and recently those of Marcel Deprez.

For Marx was before all else a revolutionist. His real mission in life was to contribute, in one way or another, to the overthrow of capitalist society and of the state institutions which it had brought into being, to contribute to the liberation of the modern proletariat, which he was the first to make conscious of its own position and its needs, conscious of the conditions of its emancipation. Fighting was his element. And he fought with a passion, a tenacity and a success such as few could rival. His work on the first Rheinische Zeitung (1842), the Paris Vorwarts (1844), the Deutsche Brusseler Zeitung (1847), the Neue Rheinische Zeitung (1848-49), the New York Tribune (1852-61), and, in addition to these, a host of militant pamphlets, work in organisations in Paris, Brussels and London, and finally, crowning all, the formation of the great International Working Men's Association - this was indeed an achievement of which its founder might well have been proud even if he had done nothing else.

And, consequently, Marx was the best hated and most calumniated man of his time. Governments, both absolutist and republican, deported him from their territories. Bourgeois, whether conservative or ultra-democratic, vied with one another in heaping slanders upon him. All this he brushed aside as though it were a cobweb, ignoring it, answering only when extreme necessity compelled him. And he died beloved, revered and mourned by millions of revolutionary fellow workers - from the mines of Siberia to California, in all parts of Europe and America - and I make bold to say that, though he may have had many opponents, he had hardly one personal enemy.

His name will endure through the ages, and so also will his work.